![]() |
| You are here: Home > Educators > Economics > Government Policy > Conflicts in Government Policy Objectives - Lesson Plan | |
|
|
Conflicts in Government Policy Objectives - Lesson Plan: 3 x 1 hour lessonsA series of 'off the shelf' lesson plans and resources for use in the classroom. These lessons deal with Conflicts in Government Policy Objectives and are relevant to the following specifications:
Aim:These lessons seek to encourage students to consider a series of arguments for a particular set of policy proposals that have wide ranging implications not only to the non-economic objectives of a government but also to the wider efficiency and equity of the economy as a whole. The Activity is centred around two groups, each of whom have a particular task - one section will act as a panel of Treasury ministers assessing the strengths of the proposal and the other section will consist of three groups working on presenting the case for a slice of the funds available for their particular project. There is a series of simple guidelines for students but it should be emphasised that these are by no means exhaustive and that the strength and quality of the argument is what is likely to win them the lion's share of the funds! Students should be encouraged to look in depth at the issue and not just follow the obvious argument - the Activity is meant to raise awareness of the wider implications of such policy decisions; the benefits of a healthy population on productivity, government spending, etc. for example, should all be explored. Within each topic area there might be further areas for analysis - for example, should the emphasis be on health prevention or health care? Should resources be devoted to heart disease, cancers, obesity or asthma? Should there be different proportions of resources put into primary education, secondary or higher education? Should those over 75 be treated differently than those aged 65+? The three groups will have time to prepare their argument and presentation, during which time the panel will do some research into current government spending levels and policy on these areas. After the groups have presented their arguments, the panel will be given time to consider their decision. During this time, the three groups should be given the opportunity of reflecting on their presentations together in an informal discussion. After the panel has presented its verdict, there can be a whole class discussion on the verdict and basis on which the decision was made. Learning Objectives:At the end of the sessions, students should be able to demonstrate:
Resources:
Lesson Structure:Lesson 1
Lesson 2
Lesson 3
|